<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Whirledview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whirledview.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whirledview.com</link>
	<description>Jim Robinson&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 04:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My Schedule for SXSWi 2011</title>
		<link>http://whirledview.com/miscellanea/my-schedule-for-sxswi-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://whirledview.com/miscellanea/my-schedule-for-sxswi-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellanea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whirledview.com/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very excited to be heading to SXSWi this year for the first time.  Unfortunately I didn&#8217;t know I was going until just a couple weeks ago, so I had to scramble to find a hotel. Turns out I&#8217;m staying pretty far outside of Austin, but I&#8217;m gonna be there and for that I&#8217;m happy. Because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whirledview.com/miscellanea/my-schedule-for-sxswi-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ampersands in rel=&#8221;canonical&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/ampersands-in-relcanonical/</link>
		<comments>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/ampersands-in-relcanonical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whirledview.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m using this as a workspace to provide an example for an SEO question for @dancristo, but by all means jump in here if you know the answer to this. I&#8217;m trying to determine if there&#8217;s a difference between the following two rel=&#8221;canonical&#8221; entries: &#60;link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/this&#38;that" /&#62; &#60;link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/this&#38;amp;that" /&#62; The first URL [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/ampersands-in-relcanonical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cost of User Preferences</title>
		<link>http://whirledview.com/user-experience/the-cost-of-user-preferences/</link>
		<comments>http://whirledview.com/user-experience/the-cost-of-user-preferences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whirledview.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I joined the Baltimore PHP Meetup for a presentation on WordPress 3.0 from Andrew Nacin, one of WordPress’ core developers.  It was an excellent presentation and Andrew covered a lot of interesting material, but the part I kept thinking about today was his section on WordPress’ release philosophy &#8211; specifically that there is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whirledview.com/user-experience/the-cost-of-user-preferences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Google Instant Help or Hurt the Long Tail?</title>
		<link>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/google-instant-long-tail/</link>
		<comments>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/google-instant-long-tail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whirledview.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SEO world is buzzing today (even enough to get me to do a blog post) about the release of Google Instant, which updates search results in real time as you type in your search query. We&#8217;ve seen some of this functionality for quite a while now with Google Suggest, which provides real time search [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/google-instant-long-tail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO for CMSs at Refresh Rockville</title>
		<link>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/seo-for-cms/</link>
		<comments>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/seo-for-cms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonicalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whirledview.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking forward to my presentation this evening for Refresh Rockville on the topic of SEO for CMSs. I’m resurrecting my blog from the dead once again in case anyone finds it through Twitter or some other means. I’d like to encourage you to leave any feedback you might have on my presentation in the comments [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/seo-for-cms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time For A [Platform] Change</title>
		<link>http://whirledview.com/whirledview-com/time-for-a-change/</link>
		<comments>http://whirledview.com/whirledview-com/time-for-a-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WhirledView.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drupal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ektron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expression engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[textpattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whirledview.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nuking everything I&#8217;d written since 2004 was a tough decision, but I needed a fresh start.  It was getting a little weird seeing personal rants from 2004 popping up around the site, and with new traffic coming from Twitter and a number of professional sources online, it was getting weirder. I decided to repurpose this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whirledview.com/whirledview-com/time-for-a-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rock The Vote With Canonical URLs</title>
		<link>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/seo-duplicate-content/</link>
		<comments>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/seo-duplicate-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whirledview.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When conducting a site audit, the low-hanging fruit for most good SEO folks is identifying duplicate content issues. On-page factors and link popularity can almost always use some improvement, but they&#8217;re not usually the kinds of things that actually do harm to your search engine rankings. Duplicate content, on the other hand, can actually hurt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/seo-duplicate-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is SEO Still Relevant in 2009?</title>
		<link>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/is-seo-still-relevant-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/is-seo-still-relevant-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whirledview.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization is dead. Search engine rankings no longer matter. I see a lot of link bait to that effect floating around these days. So what&#8217;s the deal? Is SEO still relevant in 2009? Yes. More than ever. If interest in a subject is an indicator of relevance, then SEO is clearly still alive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whirledview.com/search-engine-optmization/is-seo-still-relevant-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

